Skip to main content

Toronto Toronto mayor calls for end to Expo 2025 bid, prioritizing transit and public housing

Toronto Mayor John Tory speaks at a press conference to talk about the city's tentative four year deal with the city's inside workers, on March 3 2016. Mr. Tory said Wednesday the cash-strapped city could not support a bid for a world’s fair without federal or provincial assurances that those governments would help pay for it

Fred Lum/The Globe and Mail

Toronto Mayor John Tory dismissed an aggressive push by some local politicians and business leaders for the city to bid on Expo 2025, dropping his neutrality on the issue and voting with his executive committee to recommend that city council kill the idea – for now.

Mr. Tory said Wednesday the cash-strapped city could not support a bid for a world's fair without federal or provincial assurances that those governments would help pay for it, and do so without siphoning away money still needed for the city's long list of transit and public-housing repair projects.

"I will tell you right now, I am not going to take money out of what we need to fund transit and housing to support an Expo, or just about anything else for that matter," Mr. Tory told the committee after nearly five hours of presentations from Expo boosters.

Story continues below advertisement

However, Mr. Tory, who also rejected an Olympic bid last year, did move a motion stating that the city should remain open to future Expo bids, including in 2030.

"The commonsense answer is, not right now," the mayor said. "Not never. But not right now."

The Expo issue now goes before all of city council next month. The vote on Wednesday came after a full-court press, led by downtown councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam and developer Ken Tanenbaum, to win support for the bid. They argued it would be a catalyst to drive the redevelopment of the Port Lands and raise Toronto's global profile.

Ms. Wong-Tam insisted Wednesday's defeat was a "soft victory," saying she believed the 2025 bid could still be revived by city council.

Supporters enlisted local tech startups, the Toronto Stock Exchange, Facebook Canada, arts and community groups, the construction industry, unions, Chief Stacey Laforme of the Mississaugas of the New Credit First Nation and former Ontario cabinet minister Sandra Pupatello, to fight for the idea.

Private-sector boosters paid for a feasibility study that concluded Expo 2025 could be held for just $1.9-billion in capital costs, a number that excludes billions needed for flood-protection and other infrastructure in the Port Lands. The event itself would cost another $1.6-billion to run, an amount covered by revenues and corporate sponsors, the report says, adding that it would create jobs and big economic benefits.

Other Expos have not been nearly so cheap. Milan's event in 2015 ended up costing $19-billion (Canadian). Shanghai's, in 2010, cost an estimated $60-billion.

Story continues below advertisement

In their report on the idea, the city's senior bureaucrats recommend that Toronto pass on the bid, which they warn would be plagued by "significant challenges and risks."

Among the red flags they cite are a lack of firm support from either the federal government or Queen's Park, and the complexity of the needed flood-protection work, which would take at least seven years.

Other major projects that would have to be completed before the event include the East Bayfront light-rail transit line, a GO Transit "rapid express rail" station, and the rejigging of both the Gardiner Expressway and Lake Shore Boulevard. The tight timelines for all this work, the city report concludes, create a "very real risk of significant cost overruns."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter