Skip to main content

Members of the Free Syrian Army take up position with their weapons during clashes with forces loyal to Syria's President Bashar al-Assad, in the old city of Aleppo March 2, 2013. Picture taken March 2, 2013.


After meeting Qatar's Prime Minister Sheik Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber al-Thani this week, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry told a news conference he was convinced weapons being sent by Qatar to Syrian rebels were being transferred to "moderates" among the disparate groups of fighters.


This new rhetoric represents a definitive, if perhaps subtle turnaround in Washington's stance on the Syrian conflict.

Story continues below advertisement

Spencer Ackerman on Wired points out a top US commander told a Senate panel this week that options are being readied to secure Syria's chemical weapons.

"That's a marked shift in attitude, at the very least, from previous U.S. military assessments," he says, referring to past statements from U.S. military brass saying 75,000 troops would be required to secure the Syrian regime's chemical weapons.

All of a sudden things are moving very fast indeed. Syria's disparate political opposition is to meet in Istanbul next Tuesday to appoint an inaugural prime minister, something it has been attempting to do for months. One of the international community's longstanding demands of the opposition has been to get organized – organize and elect leaders Washington and Europe can sit down with and talk to before Western states makes any commitments to the Syrian opposition.

Britain's foreign minister has also been upping the rhetoric this week. Regarding the arming of moderate rebels, William Hague said Sunday: "You can reach consensus [on arming fighters] eventually when humanitarian need is so great and the loss of life is so great that you have to do something new to save lives. That's why I don't rule it out in the future."

The Syrian regime in Damascus continues to believe – publicly at least – that it will win the war. President Bashar al-Assad made this clear in an interview with the London Sunday Times newspaper last week.

For the first time, Washington is talking to Syrian rebels. Fred Hof, until last year the State Department's point man on Syria, wrote this week how President Obama "seems to have overcome his understandable, if regrettable reluctance to enter this key arena."

This will embolden France and Britain – long-time supporters of arming the right rebels, particularly with a European Union arms embargo on Syria up for review again in May. With hundreds dying every day on the ground, a refugee crisis that risks destabilizing neighboring countries and with Washington leaning ever closer to the idea of arming some rebels, the drums of war in Syria beat louder.

Story continues below advertisement

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author

Stephen Starr lived in Syria for five years until February 2012 and covered the revolt as a freelance journalist. He is the author of' Revolt in Syria: Eye-Witness to the Uprising'. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at