Skip to main content
quiz

Are you smarter than a Globe and Mail editor? Find out with our quiz


Globe and Mail Public Editor Sylvia Stead.

Are you better at grammar than The Globe and Mail is? Let's find out. The following quiz consists of complaints sent to me over the past year by sharp-eyed readers, invariably decrying what they call the ceaseless erosion of language standards.

But are the complaints justified – and, if so, why?

Now, I don't completely trust myself against the combined knowledge of Globe readers. So I selected which complaints to address, then turned to Victor Dwyer, an editor in Focus, to help determine which are valid and explain why.

Story continues below advertisement

So, take the test – it's multiple-choice and, just to add to the challenge, a question may have more than one right answer.

There are 15 points in all. If you score five to 10, well done. Higher than that makes you a charter member of The Globe's good-grammar fan club.

Under five? Don't despair, just blame the education system – that's what many of the complainants did. Good luck.

What is wrong in each of the following?

1 “Mr. Tory says opinion appears to be split between those that never want a school sold, and those that want every property sold.”
a. Correct
b. The comma isn’t needed
c. “That” should be “who”

Answer: B. The comma isn’t needed

C is also correct.

The comma is unnecessary, and “those” refers to people, so should take the pronoun “who.”

2Headline: “Leafs top players trade value a key concern after ugly second half”
a. Correct
b. “Players” should have an apostrophe
c. “Leafs” should have an apostrophe

Answer: B. “Players” should have an apostrophe

C is also correct, although some may beg to differ. The trade value belongs to the players. And the top players belong to the Leafs. But there are some who would argue that Leafs needs no apostrophe, for reasons somewhat akin to why it often falls off the proper name of a “teachers college” (or a “parents association”): because the college is made up of teachers (or, alternately, is for teachers) but is not possessed by them.

3 “Another report found that Vancouver’s ‘green brand’ is worth about $31-billion and it’s economy could suffer a $1.2-billion loss.”
a. Correct
b. “It’s” should be “its”

Answer: B. “It’s” should be “its”.

“Its” is the possessive pronoun; “it’s” is a contraction of “it is.” But equally problematic is the sentence’s quasi-dangling participle. The proximity of the word “brand” to the pronoun “its” would point to “brand” (not “Vancouver’s”) as the pronoun’s logical antecedent; in any case, “Vancouver’s” is a possessive adjective, not a noun, so can’t really take a pronoun anyway. I’d change the sentence to read: “Another report found that Vancouver’s ‘green brand’ is worth about $31-billion and that the city’s economy could suffer a $1.2-billion loss.”

4 Headline: “Parents find surprise goodbye note written by 6-year-old son after his death”
a. Correct
b. Should read: “Parents find surprise goodbye note from 6-year-old son after his death”
c. Should read: “After his death, parents find surprise goodbye note written by 6-year-old son”

Answer: B. Should read: “Parents find surprise goodbye note from 6-year-old son after his death”

C is arguably more readable, although technically B is a bit more correct, because it doesn’t use “his” before establishing who “he” is. But good grammar doesn’t always make good reading; B or C score a point here.

5 Headline: “Myopia is on a dramatic rise. Can outdoors and less devices for children be a solution?”
a. Correct
b. Should read: “Myopia is rising dramatically”
c. “Less” should be “fewer”

Answer: Ouch. B and C.

“On a dramatic rise” reads as a needlessly jarring remake of a settled idiom, “on the rise.” And “fewer” is used with nouns that can be counted; “less” with nouns that can’t. I’d also add “the” before “outdoors,” which here is a noun rather than an adverb (as in “He was standing outdoors”). Finally, “the outdoors and fewer devices” are not one solution but two.

6 “He gave my wife and I…”
a. Correct
b. “I” should be “me”
c. Should read “me and her”

Answer: B. “I” should be “me”

“I” should be “me” because “me” is the object of “gave,” so it takes an objective pronoun. Also, “my wife” is not only more specific than C’s “her”; putting yourself ahead of others in a sentence just isn’t polite. (Especially appalling is the increasingly common “Me and her did such and such … ” – presumably a result of the Me Generation at work.)

7 Headline: “Malaysia Airlines Flight 370: Shred of hope a drop in ocean of mystery engulfing lost plane”
a. Correct
b. Cut one of the clichés
c. Cut all the clichés

Answer: C. Cut all the clichés

8 Headline: “Harper announces spending to boost Canadian tourism in the U.S.”
a. Correct
b. Harper announces “spending in U.S. markets to encourage tourism to Canada”

Answer: B. Harper announces “spending in U.S. markets to encourage tourism to Canada”

As it stood, “Canadian tourism” could mean us going there or them coming here

9 “It is one of Canada’s only marine biology programs.”
a. Correct
b. It is either “the only” or “one of the few,” not both

Answer: B. It is either “the only” or “one of the few,” not both

Some say “one of the only” is no more or less dopey than “one of the best” or “one of the most,” both common idioms (because you could have several things in a tie for best or for, say, most interesting). But nothing can be tied for “only.”

10 “I felt all the hairs on my neck raise ...”
a. Correct
b. “Raise” should be “rise”
c. “Raise” should be “rose”

Answer: B. “Raise” should be “rise”

Now decide which word is write … er, right. (The Globe got them all wrong.)

11 “The campus was the _____ of noisy demonstrations.”
a. Sight
b. Site

Answer: B. Site.

Site, which, to cite the Canadian Oxford Dictionary, is a place where some activity is conducted.

12 “Men get a lot of _____ for their behaviour.”
a. Flack
b. Flak

Answer: B. Flak.

It is, the Globe style guide points out, the far more common of the two, and originally meant anti-aircraft fire (from Fliegerabwehrkanone, German for the gun being used). Now it means, figuratively, heavy criticism, whereas flack is slang for a press agent (not to be confused with hack, a type of writer never found at The Globe).

13 “The showmanship that Donald Trump has shown a _____ for …”
a. Flair
b. Flare

Answer: A. Flair.

Again, the style guide: Flair means an aptitude or talent, but for anything to do with a blaze or sudden burst, use flare.

14 “All _____, she has about $300,000 in savings.”
a. Tolled
b. Told

Answer: B. Please. Told.

15 “They _____ the rules to supply performance-enhancing drugs.”
a. Flaunted
b. Flouted

Answer: B. Flout.

According to the style guide, it is by far more common in news stories, and means to defy contemptuously, scoff at, as in “flout the law.” Flaunt means to display brazenly, as in “flaunt one’s wealth” (as by the man in No. 13, above, although in the absence of his tax returns, some would argue he’s hiding it instead).

Answer all of the questions to see your result
You did great.*
You didn't do too bad.*
You didn't do well at all.*
* If you answered C to question 1, C to question 4 or C to question 5, give yourself an extra point per question.
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.