Skip to main content

Final submissions in one of the most consequential trials ever held into our health-care system are at long last being heard in the B.C. Supreme Court. The case should be called the Trial of the Century because it seemingly has taken almost that long to get to this point.

It took seven years to arrive in court, and has dragged on another three years since.

It pits Brian Day (the renowned champion of a health-care universe that respects individual freedoms) against the B.C. government, which is trying to defend a system designed, in theory, to provide timely care to all regardless of circumstance.

Story continues below advertisement

Dr. Brian Day, medical director of the Cambie Surgery Centre, sits for a photograph at his office in Vancouver on Aug. 31, 2016.

Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press

Something that, in many instances, it stopped doing years ago.

Most Canadians are aware of the debate underlying this case. Private clinics began popping up several decades ago in response to the fact that governments, restrained by burgeoning costs, were increasingly incapable of providing patients with the health care they needed in the timely fashion required. Consequently, long waiting lists for everything from magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) to colonoscopies became a fact of Canadian life.

For most of that time, governments, including B.C.’s, not only turned a blind eye to these private clinics, but often used their services to address backlogs in the system. Eventually, the province couldn’t tolerate such brazen and open defiance of the Medical Services Act and so made moves to effectively put them out of business.

And so here we are today, with Dr. Day fighting for a future that would accommodate a hybrid health-care model, one that would be predominantly universal in scope but include a private element. Countries such as France are often held up as the best example of this archetype.

Still, there are many, including governments and physician groups and unions, that argue against two-tier medicine. It should be noted that B.C. has made strides in reducing wait times for MRIs and procedures such as hip and knee replacements. But there are still thousands of patients waiting inordinate amounts of time for help in addressing these and other problems.

The federal government is an intervenor in this case, along with a handful of health-care unions. This is ironic, given that the most common demographic at Dr. Day’s clinic over the years has been middle-class union workers injured on the job.

This, of course, is one of the great paradoxes of the private health-care debate: There are groups that get a free pass to use the services of these clinics to get their medical needs addressed immediately. They include those covered by B.C. workers’ compensation claims. Those who aren’t go to the back of the public health-care line along with everyone else. Think about that for a minute: two people with identical injuries; one can get treated relatively quickly and the other can’t. That is absurd.

Story continues below advertisement

So, please don’t tell me there isn’t two-tiered health care in Canada already. And there especially is when you consider other aspects of the health-care spectrum, such as, say, pharmaceuticals. Some people have their prescriptions covered by their employers; many others don’t and can’t afford the drugs they need. Some people can afford proper dental care, increasingly an important part of an individual’s overall health-care profile; others can’t.

Over the years, politicians have taken a “don’t ask, don’t tell” approach to this issue because they realize a crackdown on private clinics would drastically increase public wait times. So even the most progressive-minded officials, such as the late, great New Democrat, Jack Layton, understood the vital and inevitable role private clinics played in this country.

“Private clinics are a fundamental aspect of the health-care system founded by former Saskatchewan premier Tommy Douglas and not much can be done about them,” said Mr. Layton, who admitted in the mid-1990s to using one for a hernia problem.

In a country as big and vast as ours, it’s impossible to have equal standards of care. There are areas that are sparsely populated and difficult to get to. The medical care available to those who live in these regions is nowhere close to what exists in more populated areas. This is two-tier health care on a different level.

I will be shocked if the judge in this case sides with the province and gives the government the ammunition it’s looking for to put private clinics out of business for good. If that happens, however, it will be a dark day for health care in this country and people will suffer as a consequence.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies