Skip to main content

Michael Newcity is a professor of Slavic and Eurasian studies at Duke University.

The recent violence in Charlottesville, Va., has sharpened the focus on the movement to remove or rename memorials to Confederate leaders.

The mayor of Lexington, KY., has now called for the removal of Confederate statues in his city, following similar actions earlier this year in New Orleans. Calls to "take the statues down" have also been heard in Baltimore, Richmond, Dallas, San Antonio and on Monday, protesters pulled down a Confederate statue in Durham, N.C.

Story continues below advertisement

What is most surprising is that in this heated public debate relatively little attention has been devoted to the largest, most dynamic and famous memorials to Confederate generals: U.S. Army bases.

Ibbitson: The fascists are mobilizing in Donald Trump's name

Read more: In the former capital of the Confederacy, a struggle over history

There are eight U.S. Army bases, all located in Southern states, named after Confederate generals: Fort Bragg, N.C., Fort Benning, Ga., Fort Gordon Ga., Fort Polk, La., Fort Hood, Tex., Fort A.P. Hill,Va., Fort Lee, Va. and Fort Rucker, Ala. In addition, several National Guard facilities, such as Fort Pickett, Va. and Camp Beauregard, La., bear the names of Confederate generals.

It seems odd that the U.S. Army ever considered naming its bases after men who, by definition, conducted war against the United States. It seems even odder that a military force in which racial minorities comprise one-quarter to one-third of the force would be asked to serve on bases named after men who fought to maintain slavery.

Fort Bragg in North Carolina is a case in point. Fort Bragg is home to the U.S. Army's airborne and special operations command and is the largest military base (by population) in the world. It was created during the First World War – one of dozens of new camps created after U.S. entry into the war to facilitate a rapid expansion of the armed forces.

Many of these new bases, Fort Bragg included, were established in a hurry. The land near Fayetteville, N.C., was identified, acquired and designated as Camp Bragg all within a few months in the summer of 1918.

Story continues below advertisement

According to a War Department order, Camp Bragg was named for "Capt. Braxton Bragg, who, while commanding Battery C, Third Artillery, rendered signal service at the battle of Buena Vista, Mexico" in 1847 during the Mexican-American War. While it is undeniable that Bragg was a hero of the Mexican-American War, his greater fame was as one of a handful of full generals in the Confederate army, even though his field commands were generally unsuccessful and his relations with subordinates often tumultuous. A recent biography of Bragg is subtitled "The Most Hated Man of the Confederacy."

Fort Bragg, along with Forts Benning, Gordon and Lee, were all established during the First World War. When they were created it was the policy of the army and the War Department to name camps in Southern states after Confederate commanders, though this policy was followed intermittently. The War Department established a Camp McClellan in Anniston, Ala. in 1917, named after the commander of the U.S. Army of the Potomac during the Civil War. The other four forts listed above were established in the 1940s.

The Department of Defense and the army have been adamant that they will not consider renaming the existing bases named after Confederate generals. The army recently refused to change street names at Fort Hamilton, N.Y., named after Confederate generals Robert E. Lee and Stonewall Jackson, because they honour Lee and Jackson "as individuals, not as any particular cause or ideology."

This, plain and simple, is rubbish. During the First World War, the policy to name new Southern army camps after Confederate commanders was intended to effect a reconciliation between the North and the South, where bruised feelings about the Lost Cause were potent and widespread. The names were chosen, at least in part, to encourage Southern buy-in to the nation's new war. These names were chosen precisely because the men honoured had been Confederate leaders.

Between the Mexican War and the Civil War, Braxton Bragg lived the life of a genteel planter on a sugar cane plantation in Louisiana where slaves put in back-breaking labour in unspeakable conditions to bring molasses to market and earn Bragg a profit. He met any Northern criticism of slavery with harsh criticism.

After Lincoln's election in 1860 he was a proponent of Southern secession.

Story continues below advertisement

Let's not be in any doubt about what Braxton Bragg represents. He was a slaveholder who fought against the U.S. Army in order to preserve the South's "peculiar institution."

The time has come for Fort Bragg and the other bases named after Confederate generals to be renamed in honour of individuals who fought to defend the United States and the values that the U.S. Army is pledged to defend.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies