Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Stintz acting more like a fiscal conservative than Ford

Mayor Rob Ford of Toronto should think again about rejecting a motion on public-transit plans passed by a majority of City Council as "technically speaking, ... irrelevant." On this issue, Councillor Karen Stintz, the chair of the Toronto Transit Commission, who introduced the motion, is acting more like a fiscal conservative than Mr. Ford.

The matter in dispute is whether a light rail transit line should be entirely underground or partly on the surface. The cost of burying the whole line would be $1.9-billion. Mr. Ford is a great advocate of subways – rightly – but he is disproportionately disdainful of streetcars, and is determined not to deprive automobiles of any of the space they now have on the city's roads.

Mr. Ford insists that the overall $8.4-billion plan is a provincial project, so that the council is not the relevant decision-maker. In fact, Dalton McGuinty, the Premier of Ontario, consented to the fully underground line – a change from the plan agreed to in 2009 – in order to accommodate Mr. Ford when his election mandate was fresh. This is not a case of the Ontario government insisting on the more expensive option. On the contrary, Mr. McGuinty made clear on Thursday that the council's approval is required for the whole project to proceed.

Story continues below advertisement

The mayor's preference for subways is well founded and widely shared. And the underlying, long-term wealth of Toronto is more than sufficient for a steady program of subway building, but the fiscal relationships – past and present – among the various levels of government have got in the way of wise transportation policy.

This is no time for the quixotic Mr. Ford to attempt an ideal transit system. Both the Harper and the McGuinty governments are evidently preparing strenuously deficit-reducing budgets. And in any case, the treasuries of upper-level governments should be treated respectfully; after all, federal, provincial and municipal taxpayers are not separate groups of people.

Mr. Ford has had a recent success in the city's tentative agreement with a CUPE local. He should stay in touch with his fiscal conservatism, set aside his anger at Ms. Stintz, accept the verdict of the council and save $1.9-billion.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.