Skip to main content

Margaret Atwood's most famous dystopian novel features an evil fundamentalist regime that enslaves women. Perhaps her next one will feature an evil cabal of luxury condo developers, plotting to take over leafy old neighbourhoods and defile innocent trees.

Ms. Atwood, who happens to live in Toronto's leafy old Annex, is currently fighting an eight-storey condo development she doesn't like. She strenuously denies that this amounts to NIMBYism. She's simply standing up for the downtrodden and oppressed. "The un-rich have owned their houses for decades," she tweeted. "Why should a devlpmnt go right up to their lot lines and kill their beloved trees?"

The neighbours (who include some Westons and some Eatons) are not exactly "un-rich." Even so, they're upset too. Supermarket magnate Galen Weston and his wife, Alexandra, say the building "will devalue all of the assets we currently love about living here; it will no longer be the ideal place for our young family to grow up."

Story continues below advertisement

Not surprisingly, the younger generation isn't overly sympathetic. As The Globe and Mail's Alex Bozikovic pointed out, few people his age can afford a house in Toronto, let alone one in her hood.

Toronto is caught in the modern trap of liberal politics: The more liberal a city is, the more unaffordable it is too. Inequality appears to be growing fastest in places that are run by people dedicated to fighting inequality. Think San Francisco, where all but the wealthiest are priced out of the market. Sure, geography is a barrier to building, but the same unaffordability problem exists in San Jose, where house prices have doubled in five years. In that case, people blame an influx of affluent tech workers. But the real problem is that California isn't building new housing, while places such asTexas are. That's why so many middle-class Californians are fleeing for Texas.

"There is a deep literature tying liberal residents to illiberal housing policies that create affordability crunches for the middle class," wrote Derek Thompson in The Atlantic. Rich liberal cities think up lots of ways not to build new homes, including zoning laws, thickets of regulations, environmental restrictions, proliferating agencies that all have to give approvals, unresponsive government bureaucracies, historical preservationists and, of course, neighbourhood activists who can tie things up in knots for quite a while. All these factors boost construction costs and constrain supply. When it comes to new housing development, rich liberals are deeply conservative.

Then there's the matter of perverse incentives for the incumbents. So long as there's more demand than supply, those of us who already own houses will enjoy windfall profits. Which is another reason why once-impoverished university professors who moved into the Annex 40 years ago are not too keen on change. [Personal disclosure: I too enjoy Annex living, in a condo building that Ms. Atwood once opposed. We call it Cachet Towers.]

Most people in rich liberal cities are horrified at the very thought of anything to do with Texas, a place where Republicans prevail and regulation is a dirty word. But Dallas-Fort Worth has an abundance of affordable housing, and living standards for middle-income folks are significantly higher than they are in rich liberal cities. Taxes are lower too. So what if there's not much public transit? Your car is comfortable and air-conditioned, and gets you there faster anyway.

Liberal housing policies mean that middle-class people can no longer afford to live in liberal cities. People who belong to the creative class – writers, artists, musicians – can't either. Consequently, the most liberal cities are separating into two extremes – the managerial elites, who replicate themselves in their leafy enclaves at one end, and poor people and new immigrants at the other. Toronto now has among the highest rates of family poverty in Canada. If you like equality – and kids – try the suburbs.

The standard answer to the affordability crisis is always the same: more public housing, more rent controls, more checks on foreign buyers. A better answer is more deregulation, so that we can build more houses, not just in the city but in the hinterland. But liberals don't want to hear that.

Story continues below advertisement

The truth is, it's always fun to laugh at rich people in the Annex. But most of us behave exactly the same way they do. Who's to blame for growing inequality? Look in the mirror.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter