Skip to main content

The Supreme Court may have just killed off the NDP’s last legal hope to end a dispute with the House of Commons over payments to political staff, leaving the party’s financial picture even gloomier.

The high court declined Thursday to hear an appeal from the New Democrats over a $2.7-million dispute with the House of Commons about salaries paid to political staff after the 2011 election.

The NDP has no immediate plan for what it will do next.

Story continues below advertisement

“We are obviously disappointed with the outcome,” party spokesman Guillaume Francoeur said in an e-mail. “As this decision just came out, we will take the time to consult with our lawyers before commenting.”

The party was hoping the court would agree to overturn a 2014 order by the Commons’ board of internal economy that the party repay the salaries. The board is a committee of MPs from all parties with official status, which oversees financial and administrative matters for MPs, including the hiring of staff to work in Ottawa and constituency offices.

In 2011, after the NDP surged into official-opposition status with dozens of new MPs, the leadership opted to have some MPs share staff to do constituency work. The problem arose when the board of internal economy discovered the staff members were not working in Ottawa, as initially believed. Instead, they were in regional offices in Montreal, Toronto and Quebec City that were rented by the NDP as a party, not by the legislators in their official public capacities.

Current Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer, who was then the Speaker of the House of Commons and the chair of the board, said in 2014 that was an inappropriate use of house resources. The committee voted to order the NDP to repay the costs, which affected more than five dozen MPs.

The NDP has always maintained the order was politically motivated and has tried many times to get the courts to intervene. The Federal Court agreed with them, but in February the Federal Court of Appeal disagreed, saying the courts had no jurisdiction to intervene in the internal affairs of Parliament.

The Supreme Court Thursday declined the NDP’s request to appeal that decision, which is effectively the end of the road for the case in the courts.

The high court, following its usual practice, gave no reason for refusing to hear the case.

Story continues below advertisement

Pablo Rodriguez, the Liberal Minister of Canadian Heritage and a Quebec MP, aired his thoughts on Twitter.

“The NDP misused $2.7M in taxpayer money for its partisan operations and it keeps dragging this out in courts,” he tweeted. “This scandal needs to end. It’s time that the NDP pay back what it owes to Canadians.”

The NDP has previously said much of the money has already been repaid, but Heather Bradley, spokeswoman for the House of Commons administration, said Thursday she doesn’t have a tally of how much is still owed but that the Commons is still working with the members involved to recoup the funds.

Many of the NDP MPs affected lost their seats in 2015, but were still required to repay the costs. Some argued successfully to reduce or eliminate their bills, as they were able to prove the staff members in question were legitimate parliamentary staff and not partisan workers.

Since the last election, the NDP has struggled to raise money and in 2017, the most recent year full information is available, its liabilities exceeded its assets by more than $3-million. It also ran a $1.4-million operating deficit in 2017. Last year, the party mortgaged an office building it owns in downtown Ottawa for $12-million to free up cash.

It’s 2018 financial statements were due at the end of June, but the party has received an extension from Elections Canada so the current state of its finances is not known.

Story continues below advertisement

The party had been hoping to get the satellite office money that has been repaid back but that seems unlikely now.

After the 2015 election, when a majority of the 68 NDP MPs named in the case were defeated, the NDP sought an out-of-court settlement that would have seen the NDP’s parliamentary research budget reduced in lieu of having the MPs repay the expenses.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau nixed that deal, saying it would condone an improper use of taxpayer money.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Related topics

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies