Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Older unit at Indigo building offers bigger bang for buck

50 Lombard St., unit 1702, Toronto

50 Lombard St., No. 1702, Toronto

ASKING PRICE $569,000

SELLING PRICE $559,000

Story continues below advertisement

PREVIOUS SELLING PRICES $445,000 (2008); $327,500 (2003); $276,000 (2000); $220,000 (1996)

TAXES $2,938 (2017)

DAYS ON THE MARKET Two

LISTING AGENT Alina Kholodov, Royal LePage Real Estate Services Ltd., Johnston and Daniel Division

The Action: Maintenance fees at the Indigo building are higher than neighbouring towers around Richmond Street, so units can sit on the market for three to four weeks. To shorten that time frame, this updated, two-bedroom-plus-den suite was priced around $570,000, which was well below similar units listed in June.

"We only had one showing and they brought an offer about an hour after, so it sold quickly," agent Alina Kholodov said.

"The main reason they were attracted to the layout was because it was a corner unit and a very large suite, which we don't really see any more in Toronto."

Story continues below advertisement

What They Got: At the southeastern corner of the 24-year-old high-rise, this 1,292-square-foot unit is surrounded by large windows, essentially spanning the width of the principal room, den and master bedroom.

Set closer to the interior are two bathrooms and a kitchen with French entry doors, granite counters, stainless-steel appliances and a laundry closet.

Additional assets include a locker and parking. Monthly fees of $1,483 cover water and heating, as well as use of guest suites, a gym and rooftop deck.

The Agent's Take: "The area, five to 10 years ago, was not as hip as it is now, so it's attracting more young and older people to this building," Ms. Kholodov said.

"[The seller] had redone the entire unit – the flooring, the bathroom and all the appliances – so it was pretty much gutted and everything changed."

This unique townhouse property sold for under asking, but still went for $3,180,000
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.