Skip to main content

View taken of the Boeing logo on the fuselage of a Boeing 787-10 Dreamliner test plane on June 18, 2017 on the eve of the opening of the International Paris Air Show.

ERIC PIERMONT/AFP/Getty Images

A senior Boeing official says the U.S. aerospace giant's trade dispute with Montreal-based rival Bombardier is a "company-to-company issue," and that it still hopes to sell Super Hornet jets to Canada.

Leanne Caret, the head of Boeing's multibillion-dollar defence and space division, made the comments on the sidelines of the Paris Air Show this week, where her company was snubbed by Canadian officials.

Members of the Canadian government met F-35 manufacturer Lockheed Martin and other fighter jet makers in Paris on Monday and Tuesday, but refused to have any contact with Boeing.

Story continues below advertisement

Related: U.S. trade watchdog sees merit in Boeing's Bombardier complaint

Economic Development Minister Navdeep Bains specifically cited Boeing's complaints to the U.S. Commerce Department about Canadian rival Bombardier as the reason for the cold shoulder.

Caret, however, highlighted in an interview with U.S.-based Defense News what she said was Boeing's nearly 100-year "working relationship" with Canada and the federal government.

"This is very much a company-to-company issue that we're working through," she said of the dispute with Bombardier.

"I'm looking forward to continued dialogue with the Canadian government in terms of the capabilities that they need, and how our best products might be best suited."

The comments are the first from a senior Boeing official since the Liberal government threatened last month to scrap plans to buy 18 "interim" Super Hornets over the company's dispute with Bombardier.

The Trudeau government announced last November plans to purchase the planes to temporarily fill a critical shortage of fighter jets until a full competition to replace Canada's aging CF-18s.

Story continues below advertisement

The government said at the time that the Super Hornet was the only aircraft able to meet its immediate requirements, including being a mature design compatible with U.S. fighters.

But that was before Boeing lodged a complaint with the U.S. Commerce Department that alleged Bombardier was selling its C Series jet liners at an unfair price with help from federal government subsidies.

American authorities are currently investigating the complaint and are expected to decide in the coming weeks or months whether to penalize Bombardier with fines or tariffs.

A government source confirmed this week that Boeing's rivals used their meetings with Canadian officials in Paris to pitch their own jets in the event the Liberals follow through on their threat to Boeing.

But Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan said this week that the Liberals continue to work closely with the U.S. government, through which any sale of interim Super Hornets to Canada would actually be arranged.

And defence chief Gen. Jonathan Vance left the door open to buying Super Hornets, telling a House of Commons committee that while Boeing is "a bad partner now, maybe they become a good partner again."

Story continues below advertisement

Many defence experts, including retired air force commanders, have criticized the Liberals' plan to purchase interim Super Hornets and called for an immediate competition to replace Canada's CF-18s.

A survey of 75 such experts conducted by the Macdonald-Laurier Institute and released last week found that the vast majority didn't believe there was a shortage of jets, known as a capability gap.

Vance, however, told the committee on Tuesday that the capability gap is real.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.