Skip to main content

Chief talent officer at Borden Ladner Gervais, responsible for talent management BLG nationally, for the firm's partners and all legal and business services professionals.

The last decade has seen a fundamental transformation in the legal services landscape, following the global financial crisis. Law firms and lawyers have to change at a pace and scale not previously seen in the legal industry.

Being a successful lawyer today requires a broad and deep skill set to deal with the complex and ever-changing legal landscape. One needs to be a "T" lawyer, bringing both broad experience (represented by a horizontal line in a "T") and deep expertise in their field/discipline (represented by the vertical stroke).

Story continues below advertisement

The question, then, is how do lawyers develop this rich and varied mix of skills? Law school teaches some of them, but educators are now looking at innovative models to broaden graduates' skills.

For many years, law firms have operated an apprenticeship model of development, with young lawyers paired with those more experienced (often partners), who pass on their knowledge in much the same way as guild craftsmen did in the past.

However, firms are being challenged to provide a different approach to development, much in the same way as schools.

Mentorship remains an important element of development, but with an increasing number of millennial lawyers in the industry, this model requires a rethink.

Firstly, mentorship needs to be viewed as just one of a number of developmental interventions. Formal learning programs, sponsorship, coaching, feedback and experiential learning all play their part in developing the modern lawyer.

The concept of the T-shaped professional is gaining relevance in legal services, recognizing the need for deep legal technical expertise allied to broad business skills (e.g. business development, client relationship, legal project management or financial management). To develop a T-shaped lawyer requires a multi-pronged approach to legal education that the mentor model alone is unable to provide.

Mentorship is also changing as flaws in the old model are exposed. Choosing mentors is crucially important, as the criterion of greater experience or knowledge is, in and of itself, no guarantee of being an effective mentor. Choosing individuals who are motivated to be good mentors and who demonstrate the characteristics and traits associated with effective mentorship is key.

Story continues below advertisement

Similarly, training and developing both mentors and mentees to optimize the relationship is important. Finding the right pairing is key, as the chemistry between both parties is a vital ingredient of success. Finally, it's critical to ensure that mentors' contributions are recognized and rewarded by their organization.

The lifeblood of any mentoring relationship is feedback, and providing data to support teachable moments is important. Increasingly, technology is playing a part in providing regular real-time feedback and my firm, Borden Ladner Gervais (BLG), has recently introduced such a technology. "Feedback in a Snapshot," which has a 200-character limit similar to Twitter, gathers feedback about what a lawyer has done well and how they can develop.

More than 80 per cent of BLG's associates are millennials, and so providing a varied portfolio of development experiences is important. Peer-to-peer mentoring and reverse mentoring are other ways that lawyers can receive and provide guidance.

Mentorship remains a crucially important element in lawyer development and care needs to be exercised to ensure that the mentoring relationship is valuable. However, to build a T-shaped lawyer, in response to a complex and rapidly changing environment, both legal educators and law firms require a sophisticated, pluralistic approach to lawyer development.

Mark Mortensen of INSEAD discusses his findings about teamwork and how knowing what teams others are on can improve workflow Special to Globe and Mail Update
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter