Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Jobless rate an imperfect measure, but not a useless one for Bernanke

U.S. Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben Bernanke holds a news conference following the Fed’s two-day Federal Open Market Committee meeting in Washington Sept. 18, 2013.

GARY CAMERON/REUTERS

To understand Federal Reserve policy, one must understand the labour market.

When hiring strengthens to the satisfaction of a critical mass of the 19 men and women who help set policy, tapering of asset purchases will begin, and the walk to normal with it.

But that's precisely why Fed policy has become so confusing to so many – there's no clear barometer of the labour market's health.

Story continues below advertisement

The unemployment rate is the highest profile jobs indicator. But, as Fed chairman Ben Bernanke acknowledged Wednesday, a problematic one. The jobless rate has fallen in part because fewer people are looking for work. That exaggerates the amount of actual hiring that is taking place.

"There is a cyclical component to participation," Mr. Bernanke said at a press conference. "The unemployment rate understates the sort of true unemployment, if you will, in the economy."

This isn't a new observation. In fact, the unemployment rate is broadly dismissed for this very reason. The participation rate was 63.2 per cent in August, compared with 63.4 per cent in July and levels that exceeded 66 per cent before the recession. A shrinking participation rate isn't a sign of a vibrant economy.

Still, it's possible the participation rate overstates the weakness. That's what Mr. Bernanke thinks, anyway.

The August rate was three-tenths of a percentage point lower than it was a year ago, and the unemployment rate – 7.3 per cent – was eight-tenths of a percentage point lower than when the Fed started its third round of quantitative easing.

That relationship is "pretty much trench," Mr. Bernanke said.

"In other words, I think it would be fair to say that most of the improvement ... not all, but most of it, is due to job creation rather than too little participation," Mr. Bernanke said.

Story continues below advertisement

There are other non-economic reasons that the participation rate is falling.

More men and women are retiring as the population ages, for example. Women are joining at the same rate as they did in the past because they've closed the gap that existed after the Second World War. Younger people are going back to school. That could have something to do with a weak economy, but that's different than languishing on the sidelines.

Mr. Bernanke noted that part-time workers, discouraged workers and other indicators have fallen proportionately with the decline in the unemployment rate.

Bottom line: The unemployment rate is an imperfect indicator at the moment, but far from a useless one, at least in the eyes of the boss at the Federal Reserve.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
Senior fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation

Kevin Carmichael is a senior fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation, based in Mumbai.Previously, he was Report on Business's correspondent in Washington. He has covered finance and economics for a decade, mostly as a reporter with Bloomberg News in Ottawa and Washington. A native of New Brunswick's Upper St. More

Comments

The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨