Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Canada prepared for WTO fight on softwood lumber, Freeland says

Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland rises during Question Period in the House of Commons on Oct. 17, 2016.

Justin Tang/The Canadian Press

Canada will fight U.S. softwood lumber tariffs in front of the World Trade Organization if a negotiated settlement can't be reached, Trade Minister Chrystia Freeland says.

A tariff standstill expired last week and opened the door for U.S. industry to begin proceedings to add charges to Canadian lumber. The last softwood pact expired in 2015 and Canadian exports have since increased.

Ms. Freeland, speaking Monday in the House of Commons, said the Canadian government is now taking a "two-track approach" – pursuing a negotiated deal while preparing for any WTO fight.

Story continues below advertisement

"We understand the way to get a great deal is to be prepared for the possibility there is no deal at all," Ms. Freeland told lawmakers in Ottawa. "We want a good deal, not just any deal. And if we can't achieve a negotiated agreement, Canada's prepared to fight."

Ms. Freeland and her counterpart, U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman, pledged last week to continue to work toward a "durable and equitable solution" despite failing to reach a deal before the tariff standstill expired. Ms. Freeland addressed a portion of her comments directly to U.S. officials, saying, "I want to assure them we are negotiating in good faith" while preparing for any WTO dispute.

Any U.S. industry complaint will be filed "at the most effective time," the U.S. Lumber Coalition said in a statement last week, adding industry has "no choice" but to press the U.S. government to act against Canadian softwood. U.S. industry proposals are currently "inadequate," Ms. Freeland said Monday. "The government of Canada is prepared for any situation."

The U.S. Lumber Coalition has said any new agreement should maintain Canadian exports at or below an agreed U.S. market share. Producers in British Columbia want to choose between an export tax model and a restriction on volumes, similar to the structure of the previous agreement.

Report an error
About the Author
Parliamentary reporter

Josh is a parliamentary reporter in Ottawa. Before moving to the nation's capital in 2013, he covered provincial affairs in Edmonton and throughout Alberta. He joined the Globe in 2008 in Toronto before returning to his home province in 2010. More

Comments

The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at privacy@globeandmail.com.