Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Class action firms fight for right to steer Sino-Forest case

Staff are seen at the Sino-Forest and Sino-Panel China headquarters in Guangzhou, Southern China on June 29, 2011.

Adam Dean for The Globe and Mail

An Ontario Superior Court judge is now mulling which rival group of class action lawyers should lead the fight on behalf of burned investors who lost billions of dollars in scandal-plagued Sino-Forest Corp. Justice Paul Perell reserved judgment on Wednesday, after hearing arguments from some of the country's most prominent class-action lawyers competing for the case against Sino-Forest, which has defaulted on its debts and could be tipped into insolvency.

Some lawyers at the hearing were eager for a quick ruling, with the shadow of possible bankruptcy proceedings for Sino-Forest looming. Judge Perell did not say when he would rule, but suggested it would not be this week: "I don't think I will have a Christmas present for anybody."

In a series of questions from the bench, Judge Perell made it clear he was actively considering an order – unprecedented in Canada – that could force the law firms to work together, rather than handing the massive case to just one of them.

Story continues below advertisement

The battle to lead the class-action lawsuit against Sino-Forest and its big-name auditors and underwriters pits three rival teams of law firms against each other in what is known as a carriage fight. The firms all filed their own separate lawsuits on behalf of investors in the wake of the fraud allegations that sank the forestry company's stock this year. But only one class action can be allowed to proceed.

The case could be the largest and highest-profile shareholder class-action in Canadian history. None of the allegations in the lawsuits have been proven.

Often carriage fights like this are avoided as the small group of firms that specialize in class actions in Canada agree to work together. But no such deal was made on this case, forcing a courtroom battle that began Tuesday.

Fighting for the case are Kim Orr Barristers P.C., whose clients include the B.C. Investment Management Corp. pension fund; a team made up of lawyers from Siskinds LLP and Koskie Minsky LLP; and Rochon Genova LLP. All three groups also have affiliations with U.S. class-action law firms.

In the hearing, lawyers told the judge about the investigations they have conducted into Sino-Forest, their firms' experience on big cases, as well as argued about the various differences between the three lawsuits.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
Toronto City Hall Reporter

Jeff Gray is The Globe and Mail’s Toronto City Hall reporter. He has worked at The Globe since 1998. From 2010 to 2016, he was the law reporter in Report on Business, covering Bay Street law firms and white-collar crime. He won an honourable mention at the National Magazine Awards for investigative journalism in 2010. More

Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at privacy@globeandmail.com.