Skip to main content

Petronas-led Pacific NorthWest LNG project on Lelu Island.

Pacific Northwest LNG

Petronas has delayed making a final investment decision on plans to export liquefied natural gas from British Columbia, warning that estimated construction costs are too high.

The Petronas-led Pacific NorthWest LNG terminal proposed for Lelu Island has been budgeted to cost $11.4-billion, part of a $36-billion undertaking to ship LNG from the West Coast to energy-thirsty customers in Asia.

But Pacific NorthWest LNG warned Wednesday that pipeline and terminal engineering costs estimated so far make the Canadian LNG project uneconomic, especially against a backdrop where the Malaysian energy giant needs to scrutinize capital spending because it is being hurt by plunging oil prices.

Story continues below advertisement

In postponing the project decision, Petronas may be seeking to squeeze prospective suppliers' bids on the project in hopes of nudging the project closer to being launched. Still, the delay raises the possibility that another major resource project in Canada could be sidelined, following a string of planned oil pipelines that have run into political and environmental opposition.

The window of opportunity for LNG exports from Lelu Island is closing, Pacific NorthWest LNG president Michael Culbert said in an interview. "We have LNG cargoes that are committed for early 2019 and it is important to keep them on track," he said. "Canada has to be competitive with U.S. supplies."

Mr. Culbert declined to specify a new target date for a final investment decision, which had been set for mid-December. Industry observers say it could take until the early spring of 2015 for a decision, though any further delays will place the project at risk of being suspended.

Despite the challenges, Mr. Culbert said the project located near Prince Rupert could still get the go-ahead. "We need every piece of the cost component nailed down," he said.

Pacific NorthWest LNG selected three global engineering contractors in May, 2013, to take part in a competitive process for the LNG project's front-end engineering and design, or FEED.

The bidders are San Francisco-based Bechtel Group Inc., and two joint ventures – the KBR Inc. and JGC Corp. team and a group comprising Paris-based Technip, Samsung Engineering Co. Ltd. of South Korea and China Huanqiu Contracting & Engineering Corp.

The Technip-led group, calling themselves the West Coast LNG Partnership, even has a storefront in Prince Rupert on the same street as Pacific NorthWest LNG's office in the northwest B.C. community. KBR is based in Houston and JGC has its head office in Yokohama, Japan.

Story continues below advertisement

An estimated $3.4-billion of the project's construction costs are to be spent in Canada, mostly in British Columbia, while the remaining $8-billion would be imported goods and services, according to regulatory filings.

The FEED selection process over the past 18 months had been slated to produce a winning bid as early as Sept. 30, but Petronas doesn't like what it sees so far in a project that would produce 12.8 million tonnes annually of LNG. The project is to be split into two "trains," or the liquefaction stage that turns natural gas into a liquid through super-cooling technology.

Pacific NorthWest LNG risks missing out in the global race, especially with U.S. LNG export projects looming, Petronas chief executive officer Shamsul Azhar Abbas said.

Mr. Shamsul credited the B.C. government for introducing an LNG income-tax regime that is competitive and also praised new rules for buying carbon offsets and welcomed support from key aboriginal groups, but he noted that construction costs are a major concern.

To transport natural gas from northeast B.C. to Lelu Island, TransCanada Corp. is proposing to build a $5-billion, 900-kilometre pipeline project named Prince Rupert Gas Transmission. "PRGT continues to work with all of our contractors to refine capital cost estimates and to reflect changes we have made to the PRGT route," TransCanada spokesman Trevor Halford said in a statement.

The Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency is slated to rule on Pacific NorthWest LNG in mid-2015.

Story continues below advertisement

Pacific NorthWest LNG estimates that $36-billion will need to be spent in order to make its planned exports a reality in 2019. The massive budget includes roughly $6.7-billion in pipeline projects and $11.4-billion for the export plant at Lelu Island. The overall figure factors in Petronas's $5.2-billion acquisition of Progress Energy Canada in 2012, and accounts for at least another $12-billion related to drilling and natural gas production in northeastern B.C.

State-owned Petronas holds a 62-per-cent interest in Pacific NorthWest LNG. The four partners are China's state-owned Sinopec, whose formal name is China Petroleum & Chemical Corp. (15 per cent), India's state-run Indian Oil Corp. Ltd. (10 per cent), Japan Petroleum Exploration (10 per cent) and Petroleum Brunei (3 per cent).

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter