Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Total shelves $11-billion Alberta oil sands mine

Rising costs for labour and materials have worked against the economics at the Joslyn oil sands mine.

Total SA

The Joslyn oil sands mine has been shelved indefinitely, a result of rising industry costs that made the $11-billion project financially untenable.

French energy powerhouse Total SA, along with its partners in the Joslyn north oil sands project, unanimously decided to put the project on hold because of rising cost pressures across the entire energy industry, said André Goffart, the head of Total's Canadian division.

"Joslyn is facing the same challenge most of the industry world-wide [is], in the sense that costs are continuing to inflate when the oil price and specifically the netbacks for the oil sands are remaining stable at best – squeezing the margins," he told reporters in a conference call.

Story continues below advertisement

"We are still in the cycle within this industry where cost inflation in general is going much faster than price adjustments. We know that there is a rebalancing that needs to be done."

Major energy players have addressed a variety of industry challenges in recent years by becoming more selective with spending, developing projects in smaller chunks or postponing work in a bid to improve financial returns. Rising costs for labour and materials have long worked against the economics of new projects, and limited pipeline access to ship oil has weighed on prices for Alberta oil. Total is signed up to ship oil on three major undeveloped pipeline projects facing uncertainty: Keystone XL, Northern Gateway and the Trans Mountain expansion.

Mr. Goffart stressed that the Joslyn decision is due to the project's costs, saying its technology and execution plans must improve. Total and its partners will continue to focus "cost optimization" for Joslyn; layoffs are in the works for the French company's employees in Calgary.

Joslyn has faced troubles before. Part of the development was originally designed to use wells rather than trucks and shovels in order to extract bitumen. That idea was abandoned when an overpressurized well blew up, creating a crater.

"I thought they would have stopped the project then," said Laura Lau, a senior vice-president and portfolio manager at Toronto's Brompton Funds. "But no. More good money after bad. Good money after bad."

Total controls 38.25 per cent of the Joslyn mine, Suncor Energy Inc. holds 36.75 per cent, Occidental Petroleum Corp. owns 15 per cent and Japan's Inpex Corp. holds the remaining 10 per cent.

Suncor, which did not join the Joslyn effort until 2010, said the project could be revived. "Joslyn is a quality resource with the potential to mine given the right design and execution strategy," spokeswoman Sneh Seetal said in an e-mail.

Story continues below advertisement

Steve Williams, Suncor's chief executive officer, in August said the company will not make a decision on whether to proceed with the Joslyn mine until at least 2017.

Suncor and Total have teamed up on another mine, Fort Hills. That undeveloped project is widely regarded as more attractive than Joslyn. Mr. Williams, along with oil sands experts, did not believe it made sense to develop both Fort Hills and Joslyn at the same time. Suncor and Total in 2013 officially killed plans to proceed with their $11.6-billion Voyageur upgrader project because of rising costs, hoping it would be more profitable to ship unprocessed bitumen.

Other oil sands developments are going ahead. Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. recently said it plans to spend an additional $400-million on its Horizon oil sands expansion project this year. Steve Laut, CNRL's president, in early May said costs are favourable. Horizon, which went wildly over budget when it was first built, has an advantage over Joslyn now because it is expanding, rather than starting from scratch.

Total's Mr. Goffart would not say how much money has been spent on the Joslyn joint venture. Roughly 150 jobs in Total's Canadian division will be affected by the decision, he said, but the company will try to find places elsewhere in the company for some of those employees.

Total's ability to access capital was not a factor in the decision, Mr. Goffart said. "We know that mining projects are particularly challenging. New mining projects are all major projects and they are very capital intensive."

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author

Carrie Tait joined the Globe in January, 2011, mainly reporting on energy from the Calgary bureau. Previously, she spent six years working for the National Post in both Calgary and Toronto. She has a master’s degree in journalism from the University of Western Ontario and a bachelor’s degree in political studies from the University of Saskatchewan. More

Comments

The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

We’ve made some technical updates to our commenting software. If you are experiencing any issues posting comments, simply log out and log back in.

Discussion loading… ✨

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Combined Shape Created with Sketch.

Thank you!

You are now subscribed to the newsletter at

You can unsubscribe from this newsletter or Globe promotions at any time by clicking the link at the bottom of the newsletter, or by emailing us at privacy@globeandmail.com.