Skip to main content

Mike Nadolski is Bombardier Inc.'s vice-president of communications and public affairs.

The Globe and Mail ran a story this weekend titled "Bombardier's new Russian locomotive project has Kremlin connections," but if you go by the newspaper's actual reporting, the headline should have read: "Bombardier's new Russian locomotive project is in full compliance with all laws and regulations."

Unfortunately for readers, The Globe doesn't lead with this most salient fact. Quite to the contrary, the story opens with the insinuation that Bombardier somehow violated Canadian trade sanctions, and then leaves readers in suspense for two dozen paragraphs before acknowledging there is no such violation. And though it's clearly the bottom line of their reporting, they don't state it clearly and directly. Instead, readers have to connect the dots between bits of legalese and statements from experts buried deep within the story.

Story continues below advertisement

Read more: Bombardier's new Russian locomotive project has Kremlin connections

Bombardier seeks to be a global leader in rail transportation. We believe that people everywhere deserve access to the very best transportation technology, and we'd like to supply it. This is a goal supported by our shareholders and, we believe, the Canadian public. Yet The Globe calls into question Bombardier's ability and commitment to navigate the challenges of doing business globally in a lawful, transparent and ethical manner.

Worse, The Globe incorrectly implies that Bombardier was somehow trying to hide its involvement, noting the project was not mentioned in the company's annual report and Bombardier issued no news releases on it. Important information was not provided to put these facts in proper context.

Bombardier uses its annual report to highlight its most significant projects and milestones. Hundreds of smaller projects from around the world – including in Canada, in the United States and numerous other countries – are not mentioned. We simply can't identify every project in these reports. There's nothing mysterious, much less improper, about this.

Similarly, the lack of any Bombardier news release reflects the simple fact that our partner has responsibility for the sales and marketing of the locomotive in question. We also told The Globe in writing that the locomotive in question had not yet been certified, nor had any been sold, both of which are obvious preconditions for news releases.

Elsewhere, the story mischaracterizes past company statements. For example, the article incorrectly states that Bombardier "admitted it lobbied" the Canadian government on behalf of a particular individual, former Russian Railways head Vladimir Yakunin. Here is what I actually told The Globe in writing months ago: "Like many other companies, we informed the Canadian government of Bombardier's investments and interests in Russia when Canada was considering imposing sanctions. Our main concern was ensuring that our rail business would not be placed at a competitive disadvantage against our global competitors."

Readers would be right to apply heavy skepticism to any investigative report that buries the main outcome of its investigation. Readers would also be right to question why The Globe dedicated so much time, resources and space to this investigation compared with its coverage of other important aspects of the company. Consider that the newspaper's weekend coverage of the company's recent earnings release and progress on our major turnaround initiative received only a few hundred words.

Story continues below advertisement

At Bombardier, we make great products. We're doing exciting things. We love seeing our successes covered in the media. And when we make mistakes, we understand the public deserves a full accounting.

At the same time, the public also deserves objectivity and accuracy in stories about our company. In this instance, we believe The Globe fell far short of that standard and that the public and the hard-working women and men of our proud company deserve better.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies