Skip to main content

Many doctors are upset at the federal Liberal government's proposed changes to small-business tax policy. The average citizen may have assumed that their doctor was a government employee, rather than a self-employed contractor or small business owner. There are two major changes that affect doctors: "income sprinkling" and tax deferral for retirement purposes.

Income sprinkling refers to paying family members from the medical corporation who are not actually working to provide patient care, and lowers the overall tax burden for a doctor's family.

There is nothing unique about a physician's work that makes income sprinkling okay for them and not for others.

Story continues below advertisement

No matter your opinion on income sprinkling as a regressive tax-policy tool, it does not make sense for it to only be available to doctors and small business owners.

The issue of tax deferral for retirement purposes is less clear. It essentially lets a physician take the amount they would make over their career and pay it out to themselves over a longer period of time that spans into retirement, again lowering their overall tax burden.

Good tax policy encourages people to save – which makes money available for borrowing and investment in the economy. Taking away this corporate tax structure does make saving more difficult – but again, there is nothing inherent about being a physician that makes retirement savings different from the general population. In fact, 40 per cent of Canadians do not have a pension and are concerned they are not saving enough for retirement.

These are our patients and, as an incorporated physician in Ontario, I worry about their ability to save for retirement more than I worry about mine – they do not have the earning potential that I have as a physician.

All Canadians need a mechanism to properly save for retirement, and physicians can and should be advocating for mechanisms that help both our patients and ourselves save.

These changes will affect physicians' income (although to what extent is still unclear). The ability to incorporate in Ontario was negotiated in lieu of fee increases, and it certainly is not fair to award doctors tax loopholes rather than increase their salaries, and then close the loopholes.

But both the Ontario Medical Association and the government made a mistake when they made that deal.

Story continues below advertisement

Complicated tax structures are not the appropriate mechanism to determine physician compensation – physician compensation is. The amount our doctors make should be determined by the work they do, not the work their accountant does.

The real question is one of physician's salaries. Are doctors paid too much? Too little? Once we stop cloaking this issue behind the veil of "tax fairness" or "patient care," we can have an honest conversation about the real issue at hand. Until then, we continue to do a disservice to our patients.

Unlike the arguments for income sprinkling and tax deferral, there are factors that actually do make the path through medicine unique: Doctors begin earning much later in life, often accrue significant debt along the way and serve the public while not being paid like public servants (with maternity leave, benefits and a pension). While nuanced discussions in the public sphere can be difficult, I believe our national and provincial medical associations are capable of having that discussion.

Let's stop talking about propping up a broken tax system that benefits some Canadians and not others based on the title of their profession and not the nature of it. Instead, let's talk about supporting trainees through medical school without incurring crippling debt – making medical school more accessible to any child who dreams of one day being a doctor.

Let's talk about how physicians (and all Canadians) need access to maternity leave, pharmacare, dental care and a way to save for retirement.

Let's talk about how physicians are paid and how much physicians are paid. It would certainly be easier to follow and more interesting than talking about capital gains tax, dividends and refundable dividend tax on hand.

Story continues below advertisement

Hasan Sheikh is a Toronto-based physician

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter