Skip to main content

Mikhail Mishustin, President Vladimir Putin's nominee for the post of prime minister, speaks to lawmakers during a session of the State Duma, in Moscow, Russia, on Jan. 16, 2020.

ALEXANDER NEMENOV/AFP/Getty Images

The Russian parliament overwhelmingly backed President Vladimir Putin’s surprise choice for prime minister on Thursday after what one daily called a “January revolution," a major political overhaul that some say could set Mr. Putin up as leader for life.

The State Duma, the lower house of parliament, gave its backing to Mikhail Mishustin, a 53-year-old with almost no political profile, endorsing his nomination with 383 votes of 424 cast. Nobody voted against him; there were 41 abstentions.

Mr. Mishustin, who has headed the country’s tax service and played ice hockey with Mr. Putin, said he would name his cabinet in the near future. Mr. Putin signed a decree appointing him prime minister soon afterward.

Story continues below advertisement

His elevation is part of a sweeping shakeup of the political system announced by Mr. Putin on Wednesday, which led to the resignation of Dmitry Medvedev as prime minister along with his government.

The changes are widely seen as giving Mr. Putin, 67, scope to extend his grip on power once he leaves the presidency in 2024. He has dominated Russian politics, as president or as prime minister, for two decades.

The sudden and radical overhaul cements Mr. Putin’s control of the transition process and is seen by some as an attempt to reduce intra-clan infighting between now and 2024.

The abrupt departure of Mr. Medvedev’s government also allows Mr. Putin to show he is responding to public discontent after years of belt-tightening and an unpopular pension age hike.

Mr. Medvedev, head of the government since 2012, has been a lightning rod for Russians’ frustrations overseeing an economy buffeted by a 2014-16 downturn, Western sanctions and swings in the price of oil, Russia’s life blood.

Real wages have been falling for over five years and have gradually eroded the government’s popularity ratings, raising the prospect they could start bleeding into Mr. Putin’s own ratings, analysts and critics of the Kremlin said.

That was seen as a concern for the Kremlin ahead of a parliamentary election next year and as something that could make a smooth transition for Mr. Putin harder to achieve.

Story continues below advertisement

“There were large suspicions that if this stagnation continued and everything remains as it is, then the makeup of the new [parliament] would be considerably less friendly towards the Kremlin,” said Vladimir Tikhomirov, chief economist at the BCS Financial Group.

Critics have long accused Mr. Putin, a former KGB officer, of plotting to stay on in some capacity after his term ends to continue to wield power over the world’s largest country, which is also one of its two leading nuclear powers.

The constitutional reform proposals, which he set out on Wednesday and suggested should be put to a referendum, would give him the option of taking an enhanced role as prime minister after 2024 or a new role as head of the State Council, an official body he said he was keen to build up.

Mr. Putin on Thursday held a meeting with a working group he set up to consider his proposals. He gave it around a month to finish its work, Russian news agencies reported.

PUTIN TO ‘RULE FOR LIFE’?

Opposition politician Leonid Volkov said it looked as though Mr. Putin was digging in.

“It’s clear to everyone that everything is going exclusively towards setting Putin up to rule for life,” he wrote on social media.

Story continues below advertisement

A senior U.S. official who declined to be named because of the sensitivity of the matter said Mr. Putin had too much to lose by giving up power altogether.

“I cannot imagine him leaving power, whether that is in government or not. He is going to be protecting himself and his wealth and his authorities, guaranteeing his security,” the official said.

It was not unusual for authoritarian leaders to shuffle the people around them, said the same official.

“If you look at other long-term leaders who have behaved like Putin in terms of authority and control, they often replace their teams … they develop new cadres,” he said.

The Kommersant business daily on Thursday called Mr. Putin’s shakeup “the January revolution”. The proposals looked, Kommersant wrote, like the start of many more changes to come.

Under the current constitution, which sets a maximum of two successive terms, Mr. Putin is barred from immediately running again for the presidency in 2024, but his supporters find it hard to imagine Russian political life without him.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Putin remains popular with many Russians who see him as a welcome source of stability, even as others complain that he has been in power for too long.

Andrei Kolyadin, a former employee at the Russian presidential administration, told Reuters in an interview that Mr. Putin could morph into a national leader, possibly heading up the beefed up State Council, and help his presidential successor navigate the system he built.

“If [by 2024] there has not been a revolution in which everyone dies … then of course the person who managed this system [Mr. Putin] will keep influence over it regardless of whether he is inside the system or even in retirement,” he said.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies