Skip to main content

U.S. Politics Democratic lawmakers weigh response as former White House counsel Don McGahn defies subpoena

The White House on Monday told Don McGahn to disregard a subpoena from the Democratic-led House Judiciary Committee to appear at the hearing.

Patrick Semansky/The Associated Press

A U.S. House committee chairman on Tuesday subpoenaed two more former White House aides, including Hope Hicks, just hours after former White House Counsel Donald McGahn was a no-show for testimony before the panel at President Donald Trump’s request.

As tensions rose between the Republican President and the Democrats who control the House of Representatives, lawmakers also negotiated for future testimony by special counsel Robert Mueller on his Russia investigation and debated whether to launch high-stakes impeachment proceedings against Mr. Trump.

The showdown between Mr. Trump and the Democrats intensified after Mr. McGahn, heeding Mr. Trump’s instructions, ignored a subpoena from the Democratic-led House Judiciary Committee and did not show up to testify before the panel.

Story continues below advertisement

Undeterred in a growing conflict with Mr. Trump over congressional powers to oversee his administration, committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler announced he had issued fresh subpoenas to Ms. Hicks, the former White House communications director, and to Annie Donaldson, Mr. McGahn’s former chief of staff.

The subpoenas seek testimony and documents in connection with the committee’s probe of whether the President obstructed Mr. Mueller’s inquiry into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election and contacts between Mr. Trump’s campaign team and Moscow.

Despite Mr. McGahn’s absence, the committee held a hearing lasting about a half-hour that featured an empty chair at the witness table. Mr. Nadler said at the hearing, “Let me be clear: this committee will hear Mr. McGahn’s testimony, even if we have to go to court to secure it.”

In Mr. Mueller’s investigative report, Mr. McGahn was a key witness regarding possible obstruction of justice by Mr. Trump. Career prosecutors not involved in the case have said the report contained strong evidence that Mr. Trump committed a crime when he put pressure on Mr. McGahn to fire Mr. Mueller and later urged him to lie about it.

Attorney-General William Barr, the top U.S. law enforcement official and a Trump appointee, on May 2 snubbed the same committee, which later voted to hold him in contempt of Congress for not handing over a full, unredacted Mueller report.

At the hearing skipped by Mr. Barr, an empty chair also figured prominently and a Democratic committee member placed a ceramic chicken on the table in front of it for the cameras. The ceramic chicken did not make a repeat appearance on Tuesday.

After the hearing that Mr. McGahn skipped, several Democrats said the Judiciary Committee was negotiating with Mr. Mueller about his possible testimony. A redacted version of Mr. Mueller’s report was released by Mr. Barr last month.

Story continues below advertisement

“We are working with his team on that right now. I can’t tell you for sure if he’s going to come,” said Debbie Mucarsel-Powell, a Democratic committee member.

Republicans derided Tuesday’s session as a political stunt.

“This is becoming a regular event. It’s called the circus of Judiciary,” said the panel’s top Republican, Doug Collins.

Mr. Trump, seeking re-election in 2020, is refusing to co-operate with many congressional probes into his administration, his family and his business interests.

FORMER MODEL

In the early days of Mr. Trump’s presidency, few aides had more frequent access to him than Ms. Hicks, a former model and public relations consultant hired by Mr. Trump into the White House from his daughter Ivanka Trump’s staff. She rose to communications director, but resigned from the White House in March 2018.

Any impeachment effort would begin in the House, led by the Judiciary Committee, before action in the Republican-led Senate on whether to remove Mr. Trump from office.

Story continues below advertisement

No U.S. president has ever been removed from office through impeachment, a process spelled out in the Constitution.

House oversight committee Chairman Elijah Cummings, who is locked in another legal battle with Mr. Trump over access to his financial records, told reporters Democrats are “moving more and more” toward using impeachment as an option in the showdown with Mr. Trump.

Taking it a step further, Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez told reporters: “It’s time for us to, at the very least, open an impeachment inquiry.”

Other Democrats remained cautious, saying a federal judge’s decision against Mr. Trump on Monday in a subpoena case shows a step-by-step approach in the courts can bring results.

U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta in Washington blocked a lawsuit by Mr. Trump that attempted to quash a subpoena sent by Mr. Cummings to Mr. Trump’s long-time accounting firm Mazars LLP seeking the President’s financial records. Mr. Trump has appealed the case.

Democrats have debated for months whether to initiate the impeachment process, with some lawmakers clamouring for it. But senior leaders including House Speaker Nancy Pelosi have counselled caution for fear of a voter backlash that could benefit Mr. Trump.

Story continues below advertisement

It was not immediately clear when Democrats might pursue a contempt citation against Mr. McGahn. The rules require 48-hour notice, but many House members will be flying out of town on Thursday for the Memorial Day holiday, a logistical challenge that means any contempt vote would be unlikely before June.

The redacted, 448-page Mueller report, 22 months in the making, showed how Moscow interfered in the 2016 U.S. presidential election in Mr. Trump’s favour and detailed Trump’s attempts to impede Mr. Mueller’s probe.

The report found there was insufficient evidence to conclude that a criminal conspiracy between Moscow and the Trump campaign had taken place. It made no recommendation on whether Mr. Trump obstructed justice, leaving that question up to Congress.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter